Showing posts with label Evaluating definitions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evaluating definitions. Show all posts

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Evaluating definitions

Five critical criteria’s should be used when evaluating a definition. First, you must understand that a good and well-written definition should not be too broad or too narrow. If a definition includes too many other things that can fit the description, than it is too broad. If a definition leaves out possible descriptions that apply to the term being defined, than it is too narrow. Secondly, the definition should include the fundamental characteristics of the term being defined. A good definition also does not use the word or variation of the word in order to define the word. Doing this is using a circular definition. Fourthly, a good definition does not use figurative language and neither does it make it difficult to understand. Figurative language does not adequately define a term because it broadens things up and leaves question on to what the term can be. If a definition is to obscure it only makes sense to professionals in the field, leaving the rest of the readers puzzled and confused. Lastly, a good definition does not use emotive language. Emotive language only provokes emotion on the reader rather than give meaning to the issue being addressed. I thought this was interesting because I learned that by understanding how to evaluate definition I can communicate my thoughts to others even better.