Sadler Vs. Hunt

Although it is true that some students have difficulties writing, the value of grades over rule the actual learning experience, plagiarism is unrecognizable for many student and that scholarly writing is much like plagiarism, we must never forget that we cannot take credit for something that is not our own work. I believe that Brook J. Sadler presents the best argument because she gives a clear stand to why plagiarism should not take place, why it isn’t fair, why student do not benefit from it, why it deceive others and the student committing plagiarism, and why it doesn’t benefit the student educational career. Sadler gives a solution to the plagiarism problem that makes sense and fallows guidelines as to what the argument that Russell Hunt provides does not. Russell only states four reasons as to why plagiarism is not bad and why helping student understand plagiarism is not helpful at all. These reasons are not sufficient enough to actually cover the whole subject. This is why I think that Sadler has the better argument.